Side-by-side comparison using independent TWU lab measurements
ℹ️ Different head sizes (100 vs 98 sq in) — this affects power and forgiveness independently of the other specs.
Aggregated spec scores
Scores calculated from TWU RA, weight, head size and string pattern.
Lab data comparison
Measurements from Tennis Warehouse University (TWU)
RA Stiffness — lower = more flex & comfort
Weight — higher = more stability
Swingweight — higher = more plow-through momentum
Head Size — larger = more forgiving
Choose the Clash 100L v3 if…
Arm-sensitive players, comfort-first
Very flexible — max comfort (RA 54)
Choose the TFight 300S if…
All-court players, intermediate to advanced
Medium — balanced (RA 66)
🎵 String strategy for each frame
These are different rackets — they deserve different string setups.
Clash 100L v3
Very flexible frame (RA 54) — arm-friendly. Pair with a crisp co-poly like Luxilon ALU Power Rough at 54–58 lbs to add control and prevent the string bed feeling too elastic.
TFight 300S
Balanced stiffness (RA 66). A mid-stiffness co-poly like Babolat RPM Team or Wilson Revolve at 52–56 lbs gives a comfortable all-court setup without sacrificing spin or control.
⚖️ Specs Equalizer
Can I make these specs match?
To match the swingweight of the TFight 300S (SW 321), add 15g of lead tape at the 12 o'clock position on the Clash 100L v3. This raises its swingweight from 301 to approximately 321 kg·cm².
Still not sure?
Find which fits your specific swing
Our 2-minute quiz maps your swing speed, play style, and priorities to TWU lab data to tell you exactly which of these — or something else — is your best match.
Take the 2-minute quiz →Free · No account needed · Backed by TWU lab data