Side-by-side comparison using independent TWU lab measurements
Aggregated spec scores
Scores calculated from TWU RA, weight, head size and string pattern.
Lab data comparison
Measurements from Tennis Warehouse University (TWU)
RA Stiffness — lower = more flex & comfort
Weight — higher = more stability
Swingweight — higher = more plow-through momentum
Choose the Clash 100L v3 if…
Arm-sensitive players, comfort-first
Very flexible — max comfort (RA 54)
Choose the TFight 300 if…
All-court players, intermediate to advanced
Flexible — arm-friendly (RA 65)
🎵 String strategy for each frame
These are different rackets — they deserve different string setups.
Clash 100L v3
Very flexible frame (RA 54) — arm-friendly. Pair with a crisp co-poly like Luxilon ALU Power Rough at 54–58 lbs to add control and prevent the string bed feeling too elastic.
TFight 300
Balanced stiffness (RA 65). A mid-stiffness co-poly like Babolat RPM Team or Wilson Revolve at 52–56 lbs gives a comfortable all-court setup without sacrificing spin or control.
⚖️ Specs Equalizer
Can I make these specs match?
To match the swingweight of the TFight 300 (SW 318), add 13g of lead tape at the 12 o'clock position on the Clash 100L v3. This raises its swingweight from 301 to approximately 318 kg·cm².
Still not sure?
Find which fits your specific swing
Our 2-minute quiz maps your swing speed, play style, and priorities to TWU lab data to tell you exactly which of these — or something else — is your best match.
Take the 2-minute quiz →Free · No account needed · Backed by TWU lab data