Side-by-side comparison using independent TWU lab measurements
ℹ️ Different head sizes (98 vs 100 sq in) — this affects power and forgiveness independently of the other specs.
Aggregated spec scores
Scores calculated from TWU RA, weight, head size and string pattern.
Lab data comparison
Measurements from Tennis Warehouse University (TWU)
RA Stiffness — lower = more flex & comfort
Weight — higher = more stability
Swingweight — higher = more plow-through momentum
Head Size — larger = more forgiving
Choose the Blade 98 16x19 v10 if…
Control-first players, flat hitters, serve-and-volley
Very flexible — max comfort (RA 61)
Choose the TFight 300 if…
All-court players, intermediate to advanced
Flexible — arm-friendly (RA 65)
🎵 String strategy for each frame
These are different rackets — they deserve different string setups.
Blade 98 16x19 v10
Very flexible frame (RA 61) — arm-friendly. Pair with a crisp co-poly like Luxilon ALU Power Rough at 54–58 lbs to add control and prevent the string bed feeling too elastic.
TFight 300
Balanced stiffness (RA 65). A mid-stiffness co-poly like Babolat RPM Team or Wilson Revolve at 52–56 lbs gives a comfortable all-court setup without sacrificing spin or control.
⚖️ Specs Equalizer
Can I make these specs match?
To match the swingweight of the Blade 98 16x19 v10 (SW 323), add 4g of lead tape at the 12 o'clock position on the TFight 300. This raises its swingweight from 318 to approximately 323 kg·cm².
Still not sure?
Find which fits your specific swing
Our 2-minute quiz maps your swing speed, play style, and priorities to TWU lab data to tell you exactly which of these — or something else — is your best match.
Take the 2-minute quiz →Free · No account needed · Backed by TWU lab data