← Compare rackets

Side-by-side comparison using independent TWU lab measurements

Aggregated spec scores

Blade 98 16x19 v10Radical MP 2023
3.7Sweet Spot Forgiveness3.7
3.8Net & Volley Handling4.0
7.5Spin Potential7.5
7.1Arm Safety & Comfort5.2
5.0Raw Power5.9

Scores calculated from TWU RA, weight, head size and string pattern.

Wilson Blade 98 16x19 v10
HEAD Radical MP 2023
Head size
98 sq in
98 sq in
Weight
323g
318g
RA stiffness
61 (Very flexible)
65 (Flexible)
Swingweight
323 kg·cm²
323 kg·cm²
String pattern
16x19
16x19
Best for
flex, arm-friendly, control
control
Price tier
mid
mid

Lab data comparison

Measurements from Tennis Warehouse University (TWU)

RA Stiffness — lower = more flex & comfort

Blade 98 16x19 v10
61
Radical MP 2023
65

Weight — higher = more stability

Blade 98 16x19 v10
323g
Radical MP 2023
318g

Swingweight — higher = more plow-through momentum

Blade 98 16x19 v10
323 kg·cm²
Radical MP 2023
323 kg·cm²

Choose the Blade 98 16x19 v10 if…

Control-first players, flat hitters, serve-and-volley

Very flexible — max comfort (RA 61)

Choose the Radical MP 2023 if…

All-court players, intermediate to advanced

Flexible — arm-friendly (RA 65)

🎵 String strategy for each frame

These are different rackets — they deserve different string setups.

Blade 98 16x19 v10

Very flexible frame (RA 61) — arm-friendly. Pair with a crisp co-poly like Luxilon ALU Power Rough at 54–58 lbs to add control and prevent the string bed feeling too elastic.

Radical MP 2023

Balanced stiffness (RA 65). A mid-stiffness co-poly like Babolat RPM Team or Wilson Revolve at 52–56 lbs gives a comfortable all-court setup without sacrificing spin or control.

Still not sure?

Find which fits your specific swing

Our 2-minute quiz maps your swing speed, play style, and priorities to TWU lab data to tell you exactly which of these — or something else — is your best match.

Take the 2-minute quiz →

Free · No account needed · Backed by TWU lab data